Screen Time in Early Childhood Education
Recently, screen time bans and restrictions have been enforced across the country. Districts like LAUSD have enacted full bans for some age groups, while PreK guidelines in Texas call for no more than one hour of screen time per day. For those of us working in early childhood and elementary education, this moment is especially important. Young learners need rich human interaction, active engagement, and developmentally appropriate experiences, and technology should never be viewed as a replacement for these essentials.
Even so, when used thoughtfully, the right digital tools can extend access, improve educational insights, and help educators respond more quickly to all children’s needs in the classroom. Furthermore, educators have shared countless stories about digital tools driving substantial gains in classroom engagement, creating authentic space for critical thinking and creativity, and elevating student proficiency where traditional classroom tools have fallen short.
These arguments, both valid and well-founded, have further contributed to the tension, particularly as the AI boom enters the field of education and reiterates the familiar promise of personalized, accelerated learning. The cliché of banning what we do not understand is certainly prevalent, and districts are hesitant to make substantial investments as a result. However, Joey Wender, Executive Director of the SHLB Coalition cuts through the noise when he points out that, “when food fights break out in cafeterias, we don’t ban food in schools. We put rules in place.”
One point of agreement is that this recurring debate now reflects a shared concern: the importance of both the quality and relevance of screens in our classrooms. That is a positive step forward in our post-COVID climate.
____________________________________________________________________________________
Dr. Meghan Manfra, Faculty Director of AI Literacy at NC State’s Data Science and AI Academy and Research Affiliate at the UNC Center for Information, Technology, and Public Life, maintains that “the way we’re using technology is wrong - not the technology itself. We need to make sure that we connect technology in the classroom with sound instruction and align it with the learning sciences.” This perspective calls for strong implementation practices within classrooms and districts.
So how do we ensure that we do not add “one more responsibility” to teachers? Amina Fazullah, Head of Tech Policy Advocacy for Common Sense Media explains that “rather than pull away from technology, we are called to support the tech leaders within districts.” In this regard, high-quality technology implementation requires a team to drive success. Smaller districts may not have such teams in place, so consider these practical tips:
- Focus on implementation quality. Use a framework as a curriculum team to define what high-quality tools look like for your school and students. Ask questions such as: Is this passive or active technology? Which school improvement goals are addressed by this tool? How can this tool help save time?
- Consider the audience. While some digital tools, such as Ignite by Hatch™, require educators to review digital data or support home-to-school data sharing, they typically involve only about five minutes per day of children’s screen time, helping to ease concerns about screens in classrooms.
- Assess your team’s confidence in using the selected tools and then determine what training or professional development is needed to support effective implementation.
- Apply clear guidelines. Determine when technology tools should be used in classroom instruction and document this intentionally in your implementation plan. Scheduling can serve as a safeguard against both overuse and underuse.
____________________________________________________________________________________
As a leader in early childhood education solutions for over 40 years, Hatch Early Learning has consistently maintained that early learning should be playful, developmentally appropriate, and focused on nurturing the whole child. Hatch partners with educational leaders and teachers to keep them at the forefront of the classroom, which is why each tool developed by Hatch is designed to support teachers’ needs - from providing data on how children learn and develop, to offering standards-aligned content and reports that inform student support initiatives. In this context, the screen time debate becomes a moot point, as Hatch’s tools make it even more possible for the teacher to remain the primary facilitator of instruction.
At the heart of this conversation is not the technology itself, but the educator who brings learning to life. Debates about screen time often overlook the professional judgment teachers exercise every day; in how they select, adapt, and integrate tools to meet the diverse developmental needs of young children. When educators are positioned as decision-makers, technology becomes one of many resources they can leverage to deepen engagement, personalize learning, and extend their reach. Framing the conversation in this way shifts the focus from limiting tools to empowering the professionals who use them with intention and expertise.
Larry Cuban (1986) reminded us that the chalkboard was once considered a form of classroom technology. Innovations have continued to emerge ever since, and there are no signs of that slowing down. Rather than ban them, we should become more curious about their impact and how to make them work more effectively for us.
Did you miss our panel discussion on tech in the ECE space? Recap the discussion here.